The Army announced in September that it plans to eliminate 6,500 active-duty aviation positions over the next two years. This decision marks a shift as the service pivots toward unmanned aircraft systems and away from traditional manned helicopters.

Now, talent panels are underway to assess which soldiers will stay in aviation and 

. If you're an Army aviator, here's what you need to know about this process and how it might affect your career.

The talent panels focus on junior officers from year groups 2020 to 2023 and untracked warrant officers from year groups 2022 to 2024. These reviews primarily target soldiers assigned to Apache and Black Hawk units.

The Army is considering expanding these panels to include enlisted aviation troops later. This could affect mechanics, maintenance personnel, and flight crew members.

Commanders have already counseled every soldier in the affected population. They asked about career goals, interests, and whether aviation remains the right fit. Based on these conversations, commanders created order-of-merit lists for their units.

A panel made up of a brigadier general, senior Army warrant officers, and a former brigade commander reviews these lists. They assess each soldier's record and divide them into three tiers: top, middle, and bottom thirds.

The talent panels aim to give soldiers a voice in their future rather than simply forcing people out. As the Army cuts aviation jobs to make room for drone operations, leadership wants to minimize involuntary separations.

Soldiers in the bottom third receive counseling about their "at-risk" status. Commanders present options and encourage them to consider other career paths. The goal is voluntary movement rather than involuntary separation.

Major General Clair Gill, commander of the 

, emphasized that the Army wants to retain qualified personnel. The service hopes to reach reduction goals through voluntary transfers within the Army, to other services, or through natural attrition.

The panels launched in October 2025. If involuntary cuts become necessary, they won't happen for at least a year to two manning cycles. The Army plans to complete the full aviation reduction by fiscal year 2027.

Force reduction goals are in the dozens per year group, according to Army leadership. The service is taking additional steps to realign soldiers, including overstaffing attack battalions to absorb some displaced personnel.

These cuts are separate from the roughly 4,600 

 positions being eliminated. The Reserve drawdown will eliminate all Army Reserve helicopter units by summer 2026.

The Army evaluates retention based on several factors:

Progress toward pilot-in-command status for Army warrant officers

Soldiers with strong evaluations, clear progression, and a commitment to aviation careers have the best chance of staying in their current roles.

Soldiers in the bottom third face the highest risk of transition. As the Army cuts aviation jobs across the force, those who haven't progressed toward pilot-in-command status or who have expressed interest in other fields may be encouraged to move.

Yes. The Army emphasizes that soldiers can express career preferences. Panels consider your skills, interests, and where you might benefit the Army most outside aviation.

 In 2024, the Army offered lieutenants opportunities to transfer into understrength fields like air defense, logistics, signal corps, information technology, engineering, and space operations.

Start exploring other career fields within the Army. The service needs people in cyber, air defense, logistics, signal corps, and space operations. These fields offer solid career progression and valuable skills.

The reality that the Army cuts aviation jobs doesn't mean your military career is over. Your flight experience, technical knowledge, and leadership ability translate well to many other specialties.

Consider aviation positions in sister services. Your flight experience may transfer to Navy helicopter programs or Air Force drone operations, though additional training will be required. The skills you've developed as Army helicopter pilots remain valuable across all service branches.

Look into National Guard positions. This component may have openings even as active duty and reserves cut back. Contact local recruiters and reach out to your network of existing aviators who've made this transition. Some states have robust aviation units that need experienced personnel.

Your aviation experience has real value in the civilian sector. Commercial airlines, helicopter services, medical transport, firefighting operations, and corporate aviation all need qualified pilots. Many companies specifically recruit military aviators and offer transition programs.

This might also be the right time for a complete career change. Your leadership experience, technical skills, and security clearance open doors in defense contracting, aerospace manufacturing, aviation safety, and air traffic control.

 for continued education. A degree can position you for careers in aviation management, aerospace engineering, or completely different fields. Many universities offer programs designed specifically for transitioning service members.

Connect with veteran service organizations and transition assistance programs. They offer resume writing help, interview preparation, and connections to employers who value military experience.

The reality that the Army cuts aviation jobs reflects how warfare is changing. Drones and unmanned systems now handle many missions that once required manned aircraft. This creates uncertainty but also opens new opportunities.

Start planning now. Talk to your commander about your options. 

. Connect with soldiers who've successfully transitioned. Use available resources like the

Your aviation training gave you problem-solving skills, technical expertise, and leadership ability. These qualities make you valuable whether you stay in Army aviation jobs, move to another military career field, or transition to civilian life.

The talent panels aren't the end of your career—they're a chance to take control of your next chapter. While the news that the Army is cutting aviation jobs may feel unsettling, remember that your skills and experience create opportunities wherever you choose to go next.

Army Unveils ‘Western Hemisphere Command’ at Fort Bragg. What Moves, What Stays & What It Means

Artillery Shell Explodes Over I-5 During Marines’ Celebration in California

The Army Plans to Power Future-Forward Installations with Nuclear Reactors on Bases

Army Cuts Aviation Jobs: What the New Talent Panels Mean for Your Career

The Army is launching its largest command overhaul in decades by merging 

into a single four-star Western Hemisphere Command at Fort Bragg. The goal is to streamline leadership, strengthen homeland defense, build partnerships, and reduce bureaucracy.

Army officials describe this as a major pivot toward efficiency and readiness in a leaner force. For service members, changes may mean new duty locations and altered roles. Military families might encounter relocations and new support networks. Civilian employees could face job realignments or transfers. Base communities may see changes in economic activity and daily operations.

The Western Hemisphere Command, part of the 

announced in 2025, will unify Army North, Army South, and parts of FORSCOM under one headquarters to 

 confirmed, “Forces Command will transform into Western Hemisphere Command through the consolidation of Army North and Army South.”

Gen. George said this reform will correct the imbalance of decreasing force and growing headquarters, enabling faster decision-making.

Following the merged leadership, the new command’s responsibilities will span critical roles. The Western Hemisphere Command will oversee homeland defense, partnerships across the Americas, and regional crisis responses, from humanitarian aid to cooperation with allies.

Why Fort Bragg and What It Means for San Antonio

 already houses key Army commands like FORSCOM and U.S. Army Special Operations. Its infrastructure and logistics make it ideal for a headquarters coordinating across the Americas.

Army leaders expect the Western Hemisphere Command to formally stand up within six to eight weeks, though officials emphasized that final staffing and movement decisions are still under review.

The decision has specific consequences for 

, the current base of operations for Army North and Army South. Both headquarters are expected to relocate from San Antonio to Fort Bragg, potentially reducing Army leadership and daily activity at Fort Sam Houston. 

This shift could affect civilian jobs, local contracts, and the base’s mission profile. While some operational elements may remain in Texas, most command staff and functions are planned to move, impacting the local workforce and possibly the base’s future role.

San Antonio leaders, in “Military City, USA,” worry about personnel and economic loss. The area supports about 86,000 Army-connected people. If the headquarters leaves, businesses and services reliant on military spending may be affected. Some analysts suggest Fort Sam Houston could gain new missions to offset losses.

For military families stationed in Texas, this change could mean new

, school transitions, and moving logistics. Families in North Carolina may see an influx of new arrivals, a possible increase in resources, and changes in school and housing availability. These moves may impact daily routines, local school enrollments, and support services.

Army leaders say Western Hemisphere Command will start operations by year’s end, pending activation. There’s no personnel move date yet, but detailed guidance is coming soon.

For service members and families, key things to track include:

 Stay connected with your chain of command and installation family readiness offices.

 Fort Bragg may experience a temporary strain on housing and local schools as units transition.

Employment and education counselors can assist with transfers and continuity planning.

The impact will be felt in both regions. San Antonio may retain some mission support staff, but could lose economic activity and community programs tied to military presence. Fort Bragg is likely to see job growth, more community engagement, and expanded support services due to incoming personnel.

Stepping back, this realignment is part of a broader Pentagon effort to cut overhead, reallocate funds, and modernize command structures.

Why This Change Matters for the Force and Families

This merger is not just about reducing layers; it shapes Army readiness for Western Hemisphere threats. A unified command aims to improve coordination, disaster response, regional training, and multi-domain operations. Bringing Army North and South together strengthens homeland defense and supports allies from Canada to Colombia.

Major changes bring uncertainty. Soldiers and families may face new duty stations and missions. San Antonio may lose personnel, while 

prepares to grow. Army leaders stress transparency and communication during this transition.

As Western Hemisphere Command becomes operational, the coming months will test Army readiness, family support, and strategic ability. This realignment redefines Army organization and how land forces are prepared to protect the nation and partner with allies, marking a bold step forward.

Pentagon Ends Plans to Privatize PCS: What It Really Means for Military Families and Readiness

“We’ve Never Seen Anything Like This”: Military Families Flood Food Pantries as Shutdown Triggers 300% Surge

Army Unveils ‘Western Hemisphere Command’ at Fort Bragg. What Moves, What Stays & What It Means 

The sight of artillery projectiles exploding midair is such an awe-inspiring, unforgettable sight is it any wonder it’s a component of some of America’s most iconic imagery: “… by the rocket’s red glare, the bombs bursting in air…” But it’s not exactly something you want to see happening over, say, a highway with a bunch of police officers and their vehicles parked on it. Which is, unfortunately, 

what happened during a much-hyped live fire exercise by United States Marines

 on Saturday, October 18th. Luckily, no one was hurt, and the damage done was negligible. But the incident still begs the question: how, exactly, did the USMC wind up raining shrapnel down on a California highway?

Why Were the Marines Firing Artillery Over a Highway?

The artillery volley that led to the incident was part of an “

,” demonstrating the Corps’ expertise at conducting amphibious landings. And not just because it’s the Marine’s proverbial bread and butter, but as part of the ongoing events honoring the branch’s upcoming 250th birthday on November 10th. 

, which took place on Camp Pendleton’s Red Beach, included elements of 

, more than 35 aircraft, dozens of vehicles, multiple hovercraft, and thousands of Marines and Sailors. The 

Vice President of the United States and Marine Corps Veteran JD Vance

The event included the firing of 155mm artillery shells from 

. This was contrary to what the military initially told both the public and California Governor Gavin Newsom. A 

post on X by the US Marines’ official account

 published on Wednesday before the demonstration claimed that “All training events will occur on approved training ranges and conform with established safety protocols. No public highways will be closed.” 

Governor Newsom’s office issued a statement

 clarifying that the White House had assured them there was no need to close any highways. All of which makes sense, as it’s reportedly rare for any training event or demonstration to include firing artillery over a highway.

But on Friday, organizers of the demonstration reached out to Newsom’s office to request that electronic billboards along Interstate 5, the highway that runs along the California coast and separates Red Beach from the rest of Camp Pendleton, 

. That same evening, the Marines fired several shells over the highway as part of a rehearsal for the next day’s demonstration. 

On Saturday morning, the billboards began displaying the phrase “LIVE WEAPONS OVER FREEWAY,” though these alerts proved moot when Governor Newsom ordered the closing of a 17-mile stretch of I-5 near Camp Pendleton. As such, the only people on the highway in that area were members of the 

 (CHP) working to provide security and ensure its closure.

At around 1:45 pm local time, during what was supposed to be the first of many volleys of howitzer fire, an artillery shell passing over I-5 towards Camp Pendleton 

, raining shrapnel on the roadway below. 

Multiple small pieces hit a CHP motorcycle without damaging it, and a 2-inch-wide chunk hit the hood of a patrol car, denting and scratching it. The 

Highway Patrol immediately notified Marine Corps personnel

, who called off all further firing across the highway. 

The CHP then made sure the highway was clear of additional shrapnel before, with the risk to vehicle traffic over, reopening I-5 to civilian traffic.

Why Did a Shell Explode Over the Highway?

While the Marine Corps has already initiated an investigation into why the shell exploded prematurely, the Los Angeles Times reported that military officials already suspect that an issue with the fuze caused the incident. 

For those unfamiliar with the shells these howitzers fire, their fuzes are separate components screwed into the noses of the shells before they’re loaded into the guns. 

The details of exactly how one of these may have been the cause of the explosion, or even if it was the cause, will likely remain somewhat of a mystery until the USMC concludes its investigation.

Today’s spoiled military members, who already have 24 different choices for 

—or MREs—will get three new choices in 2026, with even more options in the works for 2027. 

Back in my day—the late 1980s, if you’re keeping track at home—we had only 12 choices. Chicken a la King was always my favorite. The real prize came in Accessory Packet B, where we would find a tiny bottle of Tabasco Sauce. 

Today’s military members will only find hot sauce in a few of their choices. You guys and gals don’t know what you’re missing! Today’s military members can’t even get Chicken a la King anymore, but they do have a pretty wide range of options, including several vegan choices. You can find the complete list for 2025 

The next iteration of MREs is called MRE 46, and it is expected to come out in 2026. In the new MRE 46 menu, developers plan to replace three items from the MRE 45 menu based on negative feedback received from the field. 

As a result, the beef taco filling, pork sausage patty, and jalapeno pepper jack beef patty will be eliminated. In their place, military members will find a Cuban-style beef picadillo with vegetables, buffalo-style chicken, and a Thai-style red curry with chicken and rice. Yum.

 decides what gets put on the MRE menu. According to Julie Edwards, a Combat Feeding Division senior technologist and registered dietitian, "Buffalo chicken is something that [Soldiers] have requested. It's a popular item … so we're hoping that this item will be longstanding."

MRE 46 will also include more protein-filled snacks. The additions include new S'mores recovery bars and freeze-dried chocolate peanut butter bites. Another big focus of the newest iteration is more caffeinated products. 

Back in my day, sitting in a cold radar van on top of a hill near the Inner German Border, any type of caffeine was a necessity. Strangely, Edwards says caffeine has been one of the least popular MRE items among military members in recent years.

"What we've noticed is caffeine is one of the least consumed items in the MRE," Edwards said. "Previous generations were big coffee drinkers, but the newer generation of Soldiers are not."

Recognizing that staying alert is still an important part of combat effectiveness, researchers looked to develop new beverage options, as well as energy chews, energy gels, caffeinated gum, and even caffeinated jelly beans.

The Combat Feeding Division has already begun developing the 

Service members have requested more plant-based items, and, as a result, the Combat Feeding Division has developed plant-based animal crackers, a new recovery bar, a protein bar, and fruit-flavored cereal. 

In addition, Edwards said the four vegetarian meals currently available will be replaced with plant-based entrees.

Each year, food scientists at the Combat Feeding Division work to develop new components of MREs based on feedback from troops. Researchers also look at the commercial sector to see what the troops may like in new menus.

"Any new item that we get that can help bring variety and increase acceptability is important," Edwards said. "We know that eating an MRE isn't everyone's No. 1 thing, but we want to make it safe to eat—that’s our No. 1 priority—and then to make it taste good as well."

If they’re looking for recommendations, allow me to offer one. Bring back the Chicken a la King … and a mini Tabasco bottle in every accessory packet!

Artillery Shell Explodes Over I-5 During Marine's Celebration In California

These PCS Horror Stories Are So Bad They Deserve Their Own Movie

Army Cuts Aviation Jobs: What the New Talent Panels Mean For Your Career

Inside the New MRE Flavors: What Soldiers Will Be Eating Next Year

Malmstrom AFB Cancer Concerns Grow with New Information Released

Military Medical Retirement: What to Expect and How to Protect Your Benefits

For years, military families were told PCS moves would soon be seamless, efficient, and managed by a single contractor, but the promise of easier moves has yet to become a reality. The idea to privatize PCS (Permanent Change of Station) moves aimed to fix the biggest challenges with military relocation, but instead led to new problems before it even started. Now, the 

 (DoD) has officially ended the plan to privatize PCS moves.

This decision affects every family relocating, every spouse managing boxes and kids, and every service member reporting on time.

The Plan to Privatize PCS Moves, and Why It Failed

The privatization process began with the award of the 

. The aim is to streamline PCS under one manager and ease shipping worldwide. The DoD and U.S. Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) sought to fix lost or delayed shipments, unreliable carriers, and weak accountability.

By spring 2025, the plan collapsed. Promised improvements faded as HomeSafe failed to deliver obligations.

seamless transitions, timely shipments, and reliable service.

delays, missed pickups, broken items, and confusion over contacts.

Many moving companies declined involvement due to low reimbursement and poor logistics. Efficiency never came, exposing a major implementation gap.

On June 18, 2025, the DoD ended the GHC contract after 

failed to deliver. Four months later, in October of 2025, the Pentagon officially stopped privatizing PCS moves. The DoD will now improve and modernize the current 

What This Decision Means for Military Families

The Pentagon’s decision not to privatize PCS moves is more than a policy update. It directly affects families by restoring a system they know and trust.

First, your move will revert to the traditional system familiar to most military families. You will work directly with your installation’s Personal Property Office, rather than a commercial company. This brings more transparency, familiar contacts, and fewer unexpected changes during your move.

Returning to the old system brings stability for families who spent months unsure whether their movers would arrive or their shipments would be tracked. The confusion from the GHC rollout should decrease.

Book moves as early as possible to secure carriers during peak season.

Keep detailed inventories and take photos of high-value items before pack-out.

Monitor communication closely with your Transportation Office.

If you are handling a Personally Procured Move (PPM), check the current reimbursement rates. The DoD has raised them to help make up for past disruptions.

Military family complaints and advocacy drove this reversal. Feedback gathered by 

, and service branches exposed problems with privatization. This decision shows that your voice matters for mission and family readiness. 

For instance, Marissa Thompson, a Marine spouse, voiced her frustration about delays and confusion, attracting TRANSCOM’s attention and helping end privatization. Her effort shows the impact of collective voices on real change.

Ending PCS privatization improves military readiness. Moves are strategic, not just personal. When service members face moving delays, it disrupts staffing, deployments, and readiness.

Privatization was intended to boost efficiency, but it ultimately caused more problems. Delayed or mishandled shipments forced commands to address household issues instead of training or operations. Ending privatization avoids reliance on a single contractor and allows TRANSCOM to work with trusted carriers.

DoD officials now aim to make the system more reliable by increasing oversight, upgrading technology, and holding carriers accountable. Service members should see fewer disruptions and faster, smoother moves.

In short, the Pentagon’s reversal wasn’t just about bad customer service. It was about protecting the operational stability of the U.S. military.

Moving Forward: Stability, Not Experimentation

For now, PCS moves will remain familiar. The DoD is modernizing the Defense Personal Property Program with better tracking tools, improved data sharing, and more transportation office training.

This decision brings more predictability to moving, one of military life’s greatest stresses. Predictability doesn't guarantee perfection; capacity limits, staffing shortages, and peak seasons remain. Now, the DoD aims to fix these issues directly instead of depending on a private contractor. The goal is: "A move that feels routine, not risky." By planning early, documenting, and staying informed, families can ensure smoother transitions.

By deciding not to privatize PCS moves, the Pentagon is making it clear that military families’ voices matter and that mission readiness depends on their stability.

For families moving in 2026 and after: plan early, document carefully, and stay informed through your transportation office. Military life always involves moving, but now it’s managed by those who truly understand its impact. Even still, you want to be the driver of your own bus whenever possible, so advocate for your family as an added layer of preparedness, pre-PCS.

Rober Dawson,TRANSCOM's Personal Property Director, Will No Longer Oversee Military Moves

“We've Never Seen Anything Like This": Military Families Flood Food Pantries as Shutdown Triggers 300% Surge

DoD Terminates Contract With HomeSafe Alliance After Ongoing Military Household Goods Shipment Shortfalls

The logistical headache of supplying military units deployed overseas with fuel to power installations and equipment has existed since ships started running on coal. And the issue has grown exponentially complex in the centuries since then, as anyone who’s spent months or even years on some forward base powered by gigantic generators roaring 24/7, running on fuel that may have come by truck through hostile territory, can tell you that. 

But the many devices a modern military relies on to operate a base overseas, much less in a combat zone, from lightbulbs to computers, require power. Which is why on Tuesday, October 14th, the Army Secretary announced a new plan to potentially simplify (logistically speaking) the means of keeping such a base properly powered.

: a project to develop portable nuclear reactors capable of powering a forward installation for years on end.

Previous US Army Nuclear Reactor Projects

Janus is not the first Army program with the goal of putting nuclear reactors on bases. 

 (ANPP). Aimed at developing small nuclear reactors capable of withstanding the rugged conditions of remote and forward installations, the program completed their first prototype in 1957 at

The Army eventually discontinued the ANPP in 1976, but during its decades of existence, it built seven more reactors and made

 numerous contributions to the development of nuclear power

 in the United States, from the designs of reactors to safety procedures. And many veterans of the program later went on to work at civilian nuclear facilities all across the country.

The Army began to revisit the idea of deployable nuclear power a few years ago, and in 2022 it publicly announced its

, “a program intended to design, build, and demonstrate a mobile microreactor.” 

 (with the name also doubling as an acronym for Portable Energy for Lasting Effects), the project’s goal is

 (which, in the world of nuclear power, would qualify this device 

weighing as much as the average humpback whale

 as a “microreactor”) that can be packed in parts into several shipping containers and set up to power a base overseas. The project remains ongoing.

, the latest Army initiative to develop deployable microreactors, during

In his announcement, the secretary emphasized the importance of eliminating potential weak spots in military supply chains that could be exploited by an enemy during a major conflict. 

The program will be a joint effort of the Defense/War Department’s Defense Innovation Unit and the Department of Energy, though the reactors themselves will be commercially owned and operated. 

Details remain scarce, though Energy Secretary Wright said he expects the program to hit its first milestone before America turns 250 on July 4th of next year.

The primary and most important plus of installing a portable nuclear reactor on a distant Army post or FOB is, of course, that they will allow these bases to produce massive amounts of power without the need for constant shipments of new fuel sent via lengthy, complicated, and often dangerous logistic chains. 

As Secretary Driscoll said, discussing the potential of these future reactors through the lens of a future conflict in the Indo-Pacific region, 

“We are going to need energy on the actual objective. We’re going to need to be able to access power like we have never needed it before.” 

Microreactors may be the way the Army and the rest of the military can provide that localized power.

The Downsides of Nuclear Reactors on Base

 cons of powering forward operating bases with nuclear reactors

While instances of serious incidents at nuclear power plants have been relatively few over the years, the ones that have occurred

 were extremely costly and, in many cases, deadly

And putting a reactor on an installation in a hostile area on a base that is likely to face an attack, one that could damage said reactor, increases the risk of a dangerous malfunction significantly. 

There are also questions about what to do with the radioactive waste these reactors will produce and whether the costs of developing them will outmatch any potential savings. 

Whether the potential upsides outweigh these potential downsides will no doubt be a matter of much debate as the Janus Program continues and the possibility of nuclear reactors on bases comes closer to fruition.

Movin’ On Up! SecWar Announces New Barracks Task Force

Inside the $8 Billion Pentagon Workaround to Pay Troops During the Shutdown

What the Pay Our Troops Act of 2026 Could Mean for Service Members

 (PCS) knows it’s a major challenge. As families face paperwork, packing, and the hope of intact belongings, the process often reveals its harshest realities. For thousands this year, PCS horror stories highlight how logistical failures and unmet expectations can turn essential life transitions into ordeals.

 (GHC) was supposed to be the hero, a new system designed to make military moves easier. But when HomeSafe Alliance took over, things quickly went wrong. Statistics showed that over 20% of 

, leaving families stranded. Additionally, the average wait time for 

, which contributed to the chaos and amplified the frustration felt by many.

Families across the country found themselves trapped in a logistical ghost story: confirmed movers who never showed, phones ringing into the void, and shipments that seemed to vanish into thin air.

“We’d done this before. We knew how the Army move was supposed to go,” said Laura Brigman, a military spouse in Fort Johnson, Louisiana. “But this time, nothing happened. It was like our move got deleted from the system, and we were the only ones who noticed.”

Others shared similar stories: weeks spent in hotels, wearing the same clothes repeatedly, and spending extra money to get by. Even senior leadership had to face it. 

"Moving our people is mission-critical," said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. "When the system fails families, it fails readiness." 

As a potential step to address these failures, policymakers have discussed introducing low-cost incentives for moving companies. These could include financial bonuses for companies that meet scheduled pickup and delivery dates, as well as penalties if commitments are missed. The objective would be to encourage reliable, timely moves while holding contractors accountable for service shortfalls.

You finally arrive at your new duty station, ready to relax, but then the real nightmare starts. For many, the hardest part isn’t the move itself but the place they have to call home. 

Black mold is creeping from the vents. Leaky roofs. Heating systems that sound like old ships. These problems aren’t rare; they’re daily struggles in privatized military housing at many bases.

LATEST BASE NEWS

10 things to know before obtaining a VA home loan

ARTICLES

ARMY CUTS AVIATION JOBS: WHAT THE NEW TALENT PANELS MEAN FOR YOUR CAREER

By Gayleen Swiggum

ARMY UNVEILS ‘WESTERN HEMISPHERE COMMAND’ AT FORT BRAGG. WHAT MOVES, WHAT STAYS & WHAT IT MEANS

By Natalie Oliverio

ARTILLERY SHELL EXPLODES OVER I-5 DURING MARINES’ CELEBRATION IN CALIFORNIA

By Paul Mooney

INSIDE THE NEW MRE FLAVORS: WHAT SOLDIERS WILL BE EATING NEXT YEAR

By George Riebling

MALMSTROM AFB CANCER CONCERNS GROW WITH NEW INFORMATION RELEASED

By Buddy Blouin

MILITARY MEDICAL RETIREMENT: WHAT TO EXPECT AND HOW TO PROTECT YOUR BENEFITS

By Natalie Oliverio

PENTAGON ENDS PLANS TO PRIVATIZE PCS: WHAT IT REALLY MEANS FOR MILITARY FAMILIES AND READINESS

By Natalie Oliverio

THE ARMY PLANS TO POWER FUTURE-FORWARD INSTALLATIONS WITH NUCLEAR REACTORS ON BASES

By Paul Mooney

THESE PCS HORROR STORIES ARE SO BAD THEY DESERVE THEIR OWN MOVIE

By Natalie Oliverio

TRUSTED BASE INTEL. SINCE 1966.

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER